Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Many parents find it difficult to let their children go. In extreme cases, parental selves are so fused with their progeny that they cannot live without them under their roof, or at least under their control. Many children in late adolescence also find it difficult to let go of their parents and live on their own—a difficulty often faced again in the late senescence of the parents. Insofar as the gods are imaginatively triangulated within our religious families of origin, it is difficult to let them go as well. Some gods, like ancestor-ghosts and god, are conceptualized as progenitors. As we have seen, however, all supernatural agent conceptions are descendant from cognitive and coalitional mechanisms, the offspring and not the ancestors of humanity. The gods are born—and we have borne them. Once the identities of selves and groups become entangled with shared imaginative engagement with gods, bound up in ongoing attempts to rightly interpret their revelations and correctly practice their rituals, it is hard to imagine surviving without them.]
Published: Oct 15, 2015
Keywords: Public Sphere; Religious Group; Public Reason; Comprehensive Doctrine; Methodological Naturalism
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.