Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[For any human coalition to hold together, some sort of discipline is required. This applies to religious groups bound together by shared imaginative engagement with supernatural agents as well as to extended families linked together by genetic and matrimonial bonds. It is quite common for disciplinary practices within the latter to play a central role in the formation of disciples in the former. A very different sort of discipline—mental and social—is necessary for maintaining academic networks that are held together by shared research interests and goals. In this chapter, I use the conceptual framework introduced in chapter 2 to clarify the difference between theology (as it is usually practiced) and other academic fields. Like scientists in most other disciplines, scholars who operate within the fields that make up the biocultural study of religion place a high value on arguments that are based on empirical analysis and critical conceptual reflection that can be assessed by those outside their own research group.]
Published: Oct 15, 2015
Keywords: Scientific Discipline; Religious Group; Attachment Style; Attachment Figure; Religious Ritual
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.