Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Hanson (2013)
The Technological Society
S. Shu (1933)
On the nature and destiny of man
[Polytheistic, monotheistic, or pantheistic, no system, including theism as well as atheism, ever dawns on the human imagination, that does not bear the seed of its own subversion. It makes no difference if one is Greek or Jew, for remember Socrates and Jesus were equally charged with atheism as also were the latter’s followers by the Roman authorities. Like history, religion too is written from the standpoint of the winner. This standpoint seeks either to belie or vindicate legends like that of Prometheus or in particular that of Abraham smashing idols of his father.1 Not to mention Jesus and his strictures against the Temple.2 So that, recalling Feuerbach’s laconic verdict, today’s would-be “atheism is tomorrow’s religion.”3 With this difference, however: today’s atheism is methodological rather than ideological, practical rather than “confessional.”4 Wasn’t it the Devil who, in the Gospel, put faith as well as God into question by leaning on Scriptures and, slyly, muttering, “Will God really be there when you need him? ”5]
Published: Nov 1, 2015
Keywords: Religious Language; Practical Theism; Final Vocabulary; Biblical Tradition; Roman Authority
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.