Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[The introduction begins with a critical reading of data on religious affiliation from the 2009 Kenyan national census. I note how quantitative data on religion often fails to take into account how categories of religious identification often overlap and how degrees of de facto commitment may vary. I further note that the census’ use of categories such as “other Christian,” “no religion,” “other religions,” and “don’t know” raise at least as many questions as they answer. Formal religious categories are challenged by the “messiness” of de facto religious identities, as demonstrated by the brief introduction of five interviewees. The introduction then summarizes the religious repertoire model (fully developed in Chapter 2), before discussing the baggage and connotations that make everyday religious terms such as conversion and even religion challenging and potentially problematic. The section concludes with a presentation of my research methodology.]
Published: Sep 9, 2018
Keywords: Religious Mobility; Urban Kenya; affiliationAffiliation; Pentecostalism; Religious Forms
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.