Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Granit (1948)
THE OFF/ON-RATIO OF THE ISOLATED ON-OFF-ELEMENTS IN THE MAMMALIAN EYEBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 32
S. Sismondo (2009)
Ghosts in the MachineSocial Studies of Science, 39
T. Madiba, A. Dhai (2006)
Addressing authorship disputes.South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde, 96 1
L. Pauling, R. Corey (1951)
The structure of fibrous proteins of the collagen-gelatin group.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 37 5
J. Smith (1994)
Gift authorship: a poisoned chalice?BMJ, 309
W. Sacco, S. Milana (1984)
Increase in number of authors per article in ten APA journals: 1960–1980Cognitive Therapy and Research, 8
F. Reichelt, I. James, D. Milne (1998)
CREDIT WHERE CREDIT’S DUE: GUIDELINES ON AUTHORSHIPBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 26
C. Deangelis, P. Fontanarosa (2008)
Impugning the integrity of medical science: the adverse effects of industry influence.JAMA, 299 15
A. Schechter, J. Wyngaarden, J. Edsall, J. Maddox, A. Relman, M. Angell, W. Stewart (1989)
Colloquium on Scientific Authorship: Rights and ResponsibilitiesThe FASEB Journal, 3
M. Greene (2007)
The demise of the lone authorNature, 450
W. Stewart, N. Feder (1987)
The integrity of the scientific literatureNature, 325
J. PérezMartín (2008)
International Committee of Medical Journal EditorsRevista alergia Mexico, 55
J. Ross, K. Hill, D. Egilman, H. Krumholz (2008)
Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation.JAMA, 299 15
D. Healy, D. Cattell (2003)
Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeuticsBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 183
[This chapter argues that conscientious authorship is fundamental to academic culture. By going public in words, one demands recognition for the merits of one’s research and accepts being the legitimate target for justified criticisms. The writing of a scientific text is thus an intellectually and morally committing undertaking. However, there are signs to indicate that this traditional view of science is no longer self-evident. This present chapter expresses concern over the threat to intellectual standards that is represented by a growing acceptance of phenomena such as collective authorship, honorary or gift authorship, ghostwriting and commercially inspired subterfuge and deviousness, most spectacularly exemplified by phony authorships in the trials of new drugs. It is suggested that a widespread and complacent tolerance for a certain amount of phony authorship in every corner of the medical world contributes to making it tempting for the industry to put this kind of deviance into systematic use for commercial gain.]
Published: Nov 4, 2012
Keywords: Moral Responsibility; Publishing Firm; Medical Journal Editor; Important Intellectual Content; Uniform Requirement
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.