Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Wing (2007)
Science for Sale: The Perils, Rewards, and Delusions of Campus CapitalismPhysics Today, 61
R. Eisenberg (1987)
Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research.The Yale law journal, 97 2
Asle Rolland (2004)
The Free-Market Innovation Machine and New Public Management
C. Edquist, M. McKelvey (2000)
Systems of innovation : growth, competitiveness and employment
D. MacKenzie (2004)
The big, bad wolf and the rational market: portfolio insurance, the 1987 crash and the performativity of economicsEconomy and Society, 33
M. Strathern (2000)
Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy
M. Callon (2006)
What Does It Mean to Say That Economics Is Performative?Do Economists Make Markets?
Criss Shore, S. Wright (2003)
Coercive accountability: the rise of audit culture in higher education
Karin Thoresson (2011)
Att beräkna det goda samhället : Samhällsekonomiska analyser och gränslandet expertis–politik inom transportområdet
E. Hobsbawm, T. Ranger (1986)
The invention of traditionLabour/Le Travail, 18
D. MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, Leung Siu (2007)
Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics
T. Kuhn (1964)
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.The Philosophical Quarterly, 14
S. Ball (2003)
The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativityJournal of Education Policy, 18
H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff (2000)
The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and
E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, J. Wajcman (2008)
The handbook of science and technology studies
M. Power (1997)
The audit society : rituals of verificationOUP Catalogue
G. Sundbärg
Det svenska folklynnet : aforismer
M. Eklund (2007)
Adoption of the Innovation System Concept in Sweden
H. Kjellberg, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson (2006)
Multiple versions of markets: Multiplicity and performativity in market practiceIndustrial Marketing Management, 35
A. Rönnbäck, P. Berg (2004)
Svensk innovationskraft : Visionen måste vara starkare än motståndet
S. Widmalm (2008)
History of Science in the Age of Policy
Simon Smith, Vicky Ward, A. House (2011)
‘Impact’ in the proposals for the UK's Research Excellence Framework: Shifting the boundaries of academic autonomyResearch Policy, 40
Barbara Czarniawska, Guje Sevón (1996)
Translating organizational changeAdministrative Science Quarterly, 44
T. Kuhn (1996)
The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed.
S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen, T. Pinch (1995)
Handbook of Science and Technology StudiesContemporary Sociology, 24
J. Ziman (2000)
Real Science: New modes of knowledge production
A. Rai (1999)
Regulating scientific research: intellectual property rights and the norms of science.Northwestern University law review, 94 1
Elisabeth Crawford (1996)
Arrhenius: From Ionic Theory to the Greenhouse Effect
[This essay analyses the growth of an “innovation paradigm” in Swedish research policy from the 1990s and analyses how this paradigm is expressed in the government’s recent research policy bill that is currently being implemented. The discussion of the bill highlights some apparent paradoxes. First, the bill uses the notions of basis research and innovation interchangeably. Thus, for example, it proposes to increase the Swedish Research Council’s resources for supporting basic research, but it also demands that the council direct more of its resources to support work that is important for the country’s high-tech industry. Second, the bill strongly emphasises economic as well as academic competition. Scientific and economic competitions are described as if there were no significant difference between the two. The bill assumes, for instance, that the quality of research can be measured by its success on a (publishing) market. The analysis of the bill relies on the notion of performativity. The bill is seen as a performative act aiming simultaneously to change the practices of research and the language in which it is discussed. If the bill’s policies succeed, the paradoxes mentioned above will fade away as traditional research practice disappears.]
Published: Nov 4, 2012
Keywords: Innovation System; Private Enterprise; Academic Freedom; Language Game; Artificial Market
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.