Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Pestre (2003)
Regimes of Knowledge Production in Society: Towards a More Political and Social ReadingMinerva, 41
Anders Jörnesten (2008)
Forskningens nytta : Om ambivalens i forskningspolitik och vardag
Regeringen Regeringskansliet (2008)
Ett lyft för forskning och innovation
K. Grandin, N. Wormbs, S. Widmalm (2004)
The science-industry nexus : history, policy, implications : Nobel Symposium 123
H. Nowotny, P. Scott, M. Gibbons (2003)
Introduction: `Mode 2' Revisited: The New Production of KnowledgeMinerva, 41
Sheila Slaughter, Larry Leslie (1997)
Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University
Bo Malmberg (2008)
Demografi och samhällsutveckling : Nya möjligheter förutspå framtiden
Peter Josephson (2005)
Den akademiska frihetens gränser : Max Weber, Humboldtmodellen och den värdefria vetenskapen
H. Nowotny, P. Scott, M. Gibbons (2003)
Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty
Sharon Rider (2008)
Nyttan av den akademiska friheten, 2
J. Lewis-Williams (2002)
The mind in the cave : consciousness and the origins of art
S. Jasanoff (2003)
Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing ScienceMinerva, 41
P. Weingart (1997)
From “Finalization” to “Mode 2”: old wine in new bottles?Social Science Information, 36
Mats Benner, S. Sörlin (2008)
Forska lagom och vara världsbäst : Sverige inför forskningens globala strukturomvandling
M. Gibbons, C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. Trow (1994)
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies
T. Shinn (2002)
The Triple Helix and New Production of KnowledgeSocial Studies of Science, 32
Sverker Gustavsson (2007)
Oss modernister emellan
[This chapter takes at its starting point that an academic scientist or scholar, regardless of discipline, must be to produce knowledge, rather than mere opinion. By virtue of his fulfilling this mission, he also supports and contributes to a form of deliberative dialog, the sine qua non for citizenship in liberal democracies, in which argument on the basis of fact and coherence, rather than rhetorical tricks and powers of persuasion, is decisive. Demands for social relevance and usefulness ought to be seen in light of this mission, rather than in terms of political utility or commercial gain. In this sense, the requirement that the university produce useful knowledge is entirely commensurable with academic freedom, provided that politicians, administrators, and business leaders recognize that they cannot determine what questions ought to be asked or how best to answer them, but leave that matter to scientists and scholars to decide.]
Published: Nov 4, 2012
Keywords: Avian Influenza; Research Policy; Social Contract; Academic Freedom; Scientific Mission
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.