Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Heba, Jana Kapounová, E. Smyrnova-Trybulska (2014)
Theoretical conception and some practical results of the development of mathematical competences with use of e-learningInternational journal of continuing engineering education and life-long learning, 24
A. Fini (2009)
The Technological Dimension of a Massive Open Online Course: The Case of the CCK08 Course ToolsThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10
M. Kesim, Hakan Altınpulluk (2015)
A Theoretical Analysis of Moocs Types from a Perspective of Learning TheoriesProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186
Anastasia Gouseti (2010)
Web 2.0 and education: not just another case of hype, hope and disappointment?Learning, Media and Technology, 35
A. Yousef, Mohamed Chatti, U. Schroeder, Marold Wosnitza (2014)
What Drives a Successful MOOC? An Empirical Examination of Criteria to Assure Design Quality of MOOCs2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies
P. Isaías, T. Issa (2014)
Promoting communication skills for information systems students in Australian and Portuguese higher education: Action research studyEducation and Information Technologies, 19
L. Anderson, D. Krathwohl, B. Bloom (2000)
A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
Li Yuan, S. Powell (2013)
MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education
T. Bond (2001)
Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences, Second Edition
T. Daradoumis, Roxana Bassi, F. Xhafa, S. Caballé (2013)
A Review on Massive E-Learning (MOOC) Design, Delivery and Assessment2013 Eighth International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud and Internet Computing
N. Morze, E. Smyrnova-Trybulska, M. Umryk (2016)
Designing an e-university environment based on the needs of net-generation studentsInternational journal of continuing engineering education and life-long learning
R. Schuwer, Ines Jaurena, C. Aydın, E. Costello, Christian Dalsgaard, Mark Brown, D. Jansen, A. Teixeira (2015)
Opportunities and Threats of the MOOC Movement for Higher Education: the European PerspectiveThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16
Yvonne Belanger, Jessica Thornton (2013)
Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC
E. McKay (2007)
Planning effective HCI to enhance access to educational applicationsUniversal Access in the Information Society, 6
J. Daniel (2012)
Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and PossibilityJournal of interactive media in education, 2012
Manuel Barrio, M. Fernández, Sergio García (2017)
Metodología de producción para el desarrollo de contenidos audiovisuales y multimedia para MOOCRIED: Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 20
A. Santos, Y. Punie, Jonatan Muñoz (2016)
Opening up Education: A Support Framework for Higher Education Institutions
Elspeth McKay (2000)
Measurement of cognitive performance in computer programming concept acquisition: interactive effects of visual metaphors and the cognitive style construct.Journal of applied measurement, 1 3
Steven Krause, Charles Lowe (2014)
Invasion of the MOOCs : the promises and perils of massive open online courses
Margaret Wu, R. Adams (2007)
APPLYING THE RASCH MODEL TO PSYCHO-SOCIAL MEASUREMENT A PRACTICAL APPROACH
D. Jansen, R. Schuwer, A. Teixeira, C. Aydın (2015)
Comparing MOOC Adoption Strategies in Europe: Results from the HOME Project SurveyThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16
D. Damme (2015)
Open Educational Resources. A Catalyst for Innovation
[The massive open online course (MOOC) movement is the latest “big thing” in open and distance learning (ODL). Many users around of the world are interested in MOOCs. At the same time, numerous questions are still without answers: formal aspects of participation in MOOCs; the type of motivation on the part of students for participation in MOOCs; quality of MOOCs; students’ opinions about type, structure, contents and communication in MOOCs; and other aspects. The authors of this article have conducted analyses of selected aspects of MOOCs in Europe, Russia and in Australia. They considered the following aspects: what is MOOC, the history and key features of MOOCs, MOOC types, cMOOCs, xMOOCs MOOCs and open education timeline, MOOC style and motivations benefits as well as challenges for MOOC. The authors also looked at pedagogy, quality, assessments and credit, sustainability, MOOC implementation, implications for high education including policy, as well as presenting and analysing the research results of a survey conducted among students of several countries within the framework of the European Union project IRNet (www.irnet.us.edu.pl).]
Published: May 22, 2019
Keywords: MOOC; cMOOCs; xMOOCs; ODL; Quality; Structure; Contents; Communication; Implementation; Higher education; The QUEST interactive test analysis system
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.