Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
SC Biesen (2005)
10.56021/9780801882173
HB Pettey (2014)
10.3366/edinburgh/9780748691074.001.0001
[This chapter examines pragmatism and film noir, focussing on The Third Man, through the lens of the pragmatist philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce. It presents, through this classic noir thriller, a pathway into the difficult ideas of Peirce, whose thought is foundational to semiotics and critical in understanding scientific and educational thinking more broadly. To date, Peirce has not received the attention that he deserves (compared to, say, his much-cited fellow American pragmatist John Dewey). Film noir with its shadows, ambiguity, distortions and unexpected angles, and its constant and ultimately compromised search for truth, has remained a potent influence on filmmaking since the 1940s, and the archetypical film noir is Carol Reed’s The Third Man (1949). An elucidation of Peirce’s ideas through film noir can potentially provide insight not only into film theory but also philosophy, science and education. We draw on the visual power and narrative drive of The Third Man to illustrate Peirce’s subtle and powerful ideas.]
Published: Aug 27, 2021
Keywords: Peirce; Pragmatism; Abduction; Inquiry; Film noir; Scientific method; Doubt
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.