Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health SciencesStandards and Guidelines for Validation Practices: Development and Evaluation of Measurement Instruments

Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences: Standards and Guidelines for... [The objectives of this chapter are to provide an overview of standards and guidelines for validation practices in developing and evaluating measurement instruments, as well as to examine the extent to which these standards and guidelines are in line with the contemporary theories of validity. Standards and guidelines such as the AERA, APA, and NCME’s Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims), Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist, Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology’s (SIOP) Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures, and European Federation of Psychologists’ Association’s (EFPA) test evaluation model are reviewed. These standards and guidelines cover different sources of validity and they do not appear to reflect the issues, foci, and theoretical orientations seen in contemporary views of validity (e.g., Kane, Messick, Zumbo).] http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png

Validity and Validation in Social, Behavioral, and Health SciencesStandards and Guidelines for Validation Practices: Development and Evaluation of Measurement Instruments

Part of the Social Indicators Research Series Book Series (volume 54)
Editors: Zumbo, Bruno D.; Chan, Eric K.H.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/validity-and-validation-in-social-behavioral-and-health-sciences-TzmrftzklB

References (36)

Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Copyright
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
ISBN
978-3-319-07793-2
Pages
9 –24
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-07794-9_2
Publisher site
See Chapter on Publisher Site

Abstract

[The objectives of this chapter are to provide an overview of standards and guidelines for validation practices in developing and evaluating measurement instruments, as well as to examine the extent to which these standards and guidelines are in line with the contemporary theories of validity. Standards and guidelines such as the AERA, APA, and NCME’s Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims), Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist, Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology’s (SIOP) Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures, and European Federation of Psychologists’ Association’s (EFPA) test evaluation model are reviewed. These standards and guidelines cover different sources of validity and they do not appear to reflect the issues, foci, and theoretical orientations seen in contemporary views of validity (e.g., Kane, Messick, Zumbo).]

Published: Aug 21, 2014

Keywords: Construct Validity; Differential Item Functioning; Psychological Test; Validity Evidence; Item Response Modeling

There are no references for this article.