Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
International Commission (2001)
International Guidelines for Test UseInternational Journal of Testing, 1
U. Research, U. Health (2006)
Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims: draft guidanceHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 4
A. Evers, J. Muñiz, C. Hagemeister, Andreas Høtmælingen, Patricia Lindley, Anders Sjöbergr, D. Bartram (2013)
Assessing the quality of tests: revision of the EFPA review model.Psicothema, 25 3
L. Tetrick (2010)
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology
(1999)
Clinical guidelines: Developing
A. Hubley, B. Zumbo (2011)
Validity and the Consequences of Test Interpretation and UseSocial Indicators Research, 103
B. Zumbo (2006)
3 Validity: Foundational Issues and Statistical MethodologyHandbook of Statistics, 26
L. Mokkink, C. Terwee, D. Patrick, J. Alonso, P. Stratford, D. Knol, L. Bouter, H. Vet (2010)
The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi studyQuality of Life Research, 19
(2002)
Criteria for practice guideline development and evaluation.The American psychologist, 57 12
K. Lohr (2002)
Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteriaQuality of Life Research, 11
T. Scale (1996)
National Council on Measurement in Education (New
D. Borsboom (2009)
Educational Measurement (4th ed.)Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16
J. Valderas, M. Ferrer, J. Mendivil, O. Garin, L. Rajmil, M. Herdman, J. Alonso (2008)
Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 11 4
Educational Evaluation (1999)
Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing
G. Feder (2003)
Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE projectQuality and Safety in Health Care, 12
(1988)
Five perspectives on validation argument
L. Mokkink, C. Terwee, D. Patrick, J. Alonso, P. Stratford, D. Knol, L. Bouter, H. Vet (2010)
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 63 7
B. Zumbo (1999)
A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELING AS A UNITARY FRAMEWORK FOR BINARY AND LIKERT-TYPE (ORDINAL) ITEM SCORES
S. Woolf, Richard Grol, A. Hutchinson, M. Eccles, J. Grimshaw (1999)
Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelinesBMJ, 318
(1954)
TECHNICAL recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques.Psychological bulletin, 51 2:2
L. Goodwin (2001)
Interrater Agreement and ReliabilityMeasurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 5
M. Eccles, J. Grimshaw, P. Shekelle, H. Schünemann, S. Woolf (2012)
Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying topics for guidelines, guideline group composition and functioning and conflicts of interestImplementation Science : IS, 7
A. Hubley, B. Zumbo (1996)
A Dialectic on Validity: Where We Have Been and Where We Are GoingJournal of General Psychology, 123
A. Hubley, B. Zumbo (2013)
Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures: An overview.
D. Barlow, S. Mineka, Elizabeth Robinson, D. Abrahamson, S. Garfield, Mark Gold-Man, S. Hollon, G. Stricker, N. Bologna, I. Miller, Georgia Mclaughlin, Robert Sargeant, Walsh, G. Reed (2002)
Criteria for evaluating treatment guidelines.The American psychologist, 57 12
M. Kane (2013)
Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test ScoresJournal of Educational Measurement, 50
Keith Markus, D. Borsboom (2013)
Frontiers of Test Validity Theory: Measurement, Causation, and Meaning
J. Grégoire (2010)
International test commission
D. Borsboom, G. Mellenbergh, J. Heerden (2004)
The concept of validity.Psychological review, 111 4
(2009)
Validity as contextualized and pragmatic explanation, and its implications for validation practice
L. Mokkink, C. Terwee, E. Gibbons, P. Stratford, J. Alonso, D. Patrick, D. Knol, L. Bouter, H. Vet (2010)
Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) ChecklistBMC Medical Research Methodology, 10
C. Demuro, M. Clark, M. Mordin, S. Fehnel, C. Copley-Merriman, A. Gnanasakthy (2012)
Reasons for rejection of patient-reported outcome label claims: a compilation based on a review of patient-reported outcome use among new molecular entities and biologic license applications, 2006-2010.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 15 3
R. Linn (1989)
Educational measurement, 3rd ed.
(1952)
Committee on test standards
R. Lissitz (2009)
The concept of validity : revisions, new directions, and applications
Janet Carlson, K. Geisinger (2012)
Test Reviewing at the Buros Center for TestingInternational Journal of Testing, 12
[The objectives of this chapter are to provide an overview of standards and guidelines for validation practices in developing and evaluating measurement instruments, as well as to examine the extent to which these standards and guidelines are in line with the contemporary theories of validity. Standards and guidelines such as the AERA, APA, and NCME’s Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance for industry (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims), Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist, Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology’s (SIOP) Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures, and European Federation of Psychologists’ Association’s (EFPA) test evaluation model are reviewed. These standards and guidelines cover different sources of validity and they do not appear to reflect the issues, foci, and theoretical orientations seen in contemporary views of validity (e.g., Kane, Messick, Zumbo).]
Published: Aug 21, 2014
Keywords: Construct Validity; Differential Item Functioning; Psychological Test; Validity Evidence; Item Response Modeling
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.