Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[The sixth and final chapter of this book attempts use the perspective developed in the previous chapters to resolve a seeming contradiction between the doctrine of inherent substantial forcesinherent force developed in Leibniz’s dynamics and the late doctrine of the autarchy of monads, a mainstay of his late period (post-1695) metaphysics. The immediate problem is how a dynamical theory of corporeal motion can be coherent with the seeming reductive kinematic nature of physical reality implied by monadic perception. This problem is treated first by looking at Leibniz’s theory of space in the analysis situs project and using its insights to understand the nature of relative motion in his correspondences with Clarke. This investigation sheds light on the concept of physical causality in the dynamics that treats the effects of physical phenomenon as a group of internally related empirical variations. Solidifying this concept of structural or dynamical causality by contextualizing it through the methodology of symmetry and invariance that Leibniz inherited from his mentor Huygens, this notion of causality can be shown to be consistent with the autarchy of monads.]
Published: Jun 30, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.