Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Moral philosophy, and the ethics of war and peace more narrowly, support war crimes trials in the aftermath of war. This, alongside fleshing out fuller definitions of what count as war crimes (i.e., violations of any of the principles of jus- ad bellum, in bello, and post bellum) count as the main historical contribution of the discipline to the subject. Realism and pacifism either do not support war crimes trials, or do so only in an indirect sense, whereas the support of just war theory and international law are full-throated, logically mandated, and enthusiastic. Within this chapter, each of the above claims are explored and defended.]
Published: Feb 3, 2018
Keywords: War crimes trials; Moral philosophy; Just war theory; International law; Realism; Pacifism; Ethics of war and peace
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.