Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
[Chapter 6 considers the rough beginning in the House and Senate of the provision that became Title IX, analyzing strategies used by leading advocates—Green, Sandler, and Senator Birch Bayh—in the context of a male-chauvinist environment. The chapter reveals twists that belie a simple story. Bayh, the lead Senate sponsor of Title IX, Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), and other issues on women’s rights, came to his feminist position after a rude awakening to the barriers he had placed against his wife’s professional aspirations. In the House, Green voted against the very bill that she had authored, the omnibus education bill of which Title IX was a part. Another twist occurred when the provision that became Title IX was near acceptance in Congress. At that moment, advocates were forced to accept a casteist amendment that cordoned off elite higher education institutions by exempting private colleges and universities from the prohibition against sex discrimination in undergraduate admissions.]
Published: Aug 20, 2022
Keywords: Bernice Sandler; Birch Bayh; Edith Green; Male chauvinism; Sexism; Women’s sports
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.