Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Bianchi, J. Wells (2014)
Explanation and the dimensionality of spaceSynthese, 192
E. Husserl, F. Kersten (1982)
Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology
R. Torretti (1983)
Causality and Spacetime Structure in Relativity
J. Bernard, J. Bernard (2015)
Becker–Blaschke problem of spaceStudies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 52
H. Weyl
Reine InfinitesimalgeometrieMathematische Zeitschrift, 2
I. Kant, P. Guyer, A. Wood (1998)
Critique of Pure Reason: Remark to the amphiboly of concepts of reflection
E. Scholz (2004)
Hermann Weyl's Analysis of the “Problem of Space” and the Origin of Gauge StructuresScience in Context, 17
T. Ryckman (2005)
The Reign of Relativity
E. Zeeman (1964)
Causality Implies the Lorentz GroupJournal of Mathematical Physics, 5
Y. Itin, F. Hehl (2004)
Is the Lorentz signature of the metric of spacetime electromagnetic in originAnnals of Physics, 312
P. Mancosu, T. Ryckman (2002)
Mathematics and Phenomenology: The Correspondence between O. Becker and H. WeylPhilosophia Mathematica, 10
S. McCall (2006)
Chapter 10: Philosophical Consequences of the Twins ParadoxPhilosophy and Foundations of Physics, 1
E. Scholz (2012)
Leibnizian Traces in H. Weyl’s Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft
Norman Sieroka (2007)
Weyl’s ‘agens theory’ of matter and the Zurich FichteStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 38
H. Weyl (2005)
Geometrie und PhysikNaturwissenschaften, 19
H. Weyl (1922)
Die Einzigartigkeit der Pythagoreischen MaßbestimmungMathematische Zeitschrift, 12
R. Coleman, H. Korté (1984)
Constraints on the nature of inertial motion arising from the universality of free fall and the conformal causal structure of space‐timeJournal of Mathematical Physics, 25
H. Weyl
Mathematische Analyse des Raumproblems: Vorlesungen, gehalten in Barcelona und Madrid
[In analyzing the problem of space from 1917 to 1923, Hermann Weyl confronted with the philosophical underpinnings of the theories of space. Weyl endorsed the distinction between the question of the essence of space and the question of its objective representation, a distinction that many philosophers, such as Ernst Cassirer, inherited from Immanuel Kant’s philosophy. However, Weyl aimed to offer a reliable alternative to Kant’s transcendental idealism of space and time, by means of mathematics and symbolic construction. The consequences of this move will be analyzed in Weyl’s reflection on the epistemology of science after the 1920s and in his late works, with emphasis on his “Why is the World Four-Dimensional?” (1955): a signature of the fact that the problem of space had open questions that engaged the mathematical physicist throughout his entire life.]
Published: Oct 10, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.