Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Dissociating Two Forms of Auditory Distraction in a Novel Stroop Serial Recall Experiment

Dissociating Two Forms of Auditory Distraction in a Novel Stroop Serial Recall Experiment We report a dissociation of two forms of auditory distraction within a single repeated-measures experiment using a novel Stroop serial recall task in which participants were oriented either to serially recall six color-words (low task-load condition) or the incongruent colors in which those words were presented (high task-load condition). The disruption of serial recall due to a single deviation in the voice delivering a sequence of task-irrelevant speech tokens (the deviation effect) was replicated in the low task-load condition but eliminated in the high task-load condition. In contrast, the disruption of serial recall by continuously changing compared to a repeating sound (the changing-state effect) did not differ according to task-load. The results provide further support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction: Disruption due to attentional diversion (cf. the deviation effect) is modulated by levels of focal task-engagement whereas interference-by-process (cf. changing-state effect) – in which the processing of the sound conflicts with seriation processes involved in task performance – is not. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Auditory Perception & Cognition Taylor & Francis

Dissociating Two Forms of Auditory Distraction in a Novel Stroop Serial Recall Experiment

Dissociating Two Forms of Auditory Distraction in a Novel Stroop Serial Recall Experiment

Auditory Perception & Cognition , Volume 2 (3): 14 – Jul 3, 2019

Abstract

We report a dissociation of two forms of auditory distraction within a single repeated-measures experiment using a novel Stroop serial recall task in which participants were oriented either to serially recall six color-words (low task-load condition) or the incongruent colors in which those words were presented (high task-load condition). The disruption of serial recall due to a single deviation in the voice delivering a sequence of task-irrelevant speech tokens (the deviation effect) was replicated in the low task-load condition but eliminated in the high task-load condition. In contrast, the disruption of serial recall by continuously changing compared to a repeating sound (the changing-state effect) did not differ according to task-load. The results provide further support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction: Disruption due to attentional diversion (cf. the deviation effect) is modulated by levels of focal task-engagement whereas interference-by-process (cf. changing-state effect) – in which the processing of the sound conflicts with seriation processes involved in task performance – is not.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/dissociating-two-forms-of-auditory-distraction-in-a-novel-stroop-O23Xer0vhY

References (55)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
ISSN
2574-2450
eISSN
2574-2442
DOI
10.1080/25742442.2020.1760757
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We report a dissociation of two forms of auditory distraction within a single repeated-measures experiment using a novel Stroop serial recall task in which participants were oriented either to serially recall six color-words (low task-load condition) or the incongruent colors in which those words were presented (high task-load condition). The disruption of serial recall due to a single deviation in the voice delivering a sequence of task-irrelevant speech tokens (the deviation effect) was replicated in the low task-load condition but eliminated in the high task-load condition. In contrast, the disruption of serial recall by continuously changing compared to a repeating sound (the changing-state effect) did not differ according to task-load. The results provide further support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction: Disruption due to attentional diversion (cf. the deviation effect) is modulated by levels of focal task-engagement whereas interference-by-process (cf. changing-state effect) – in which the processing of the sound conflicts with seriation processes involved in task performance – is not.

Journal

Auditory Perception & CognitionTaylor & Francis

Published: Jul 3, 2019

Keywords: Auditory distraction; serial recall; Stroop; interference-by-process; attentional diversion; task-load

There are no references for this article.