Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Belardo Jaya, Ferina Cahyani, Idris Idris, R. Permata (2022)
METHOD AND PRINCIPLE OF MARITIME BOUNDARY DELIMITATION BETWEEN STATES WITH OPPOSITE OR ADJACENT COASTS (CASE OF INDONESIA AND TIMOR-LESTE)Diponegoro Law Review
Vincent Cogliati-Bantz (2016)
The South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China)The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 31
Alief Sambogo (2019)
PENAMAAN LAUT NATUNA UTARA OLEH PEMERINTAH INDONESIA DALAM PRESPEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONALJurist-Diction
D. Agusman, Citra Fatihah (2020)
Celebrating the 25th Anniversary of UNCLOS Legal Perspective: The Natuna CaseIndonesian Journal of International Law
Belardo Jaya, Afandi Sitamala, Danial (2021)
State Exclusivity of Fisheries Resources on Exclusive Economic Zone in Efforts to Support the Fisheries Availability as a Means of Increasing Food Security for the StateJoint proceedings of the 2nd and the 3rd International Conference on Food Security Innovation (ICFSI 2018-2019)
A. Afriansyah, Dila Paruna, Rania Andiani (2020)
(Un)Blurred Concept of Sovereign Rights at Sea : Implementation ContextLAW REFORM
Albana Karapanço (2012)
The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea: The Legal Framework and a Critical Review of its Acceptance
V. Schatz (2016)
Fishing for Interpretation: The ITLOS Advisory Opinion on Flag State Responsibility for Illegal Fishing in the EEZOcean Development & International Law, 47
R. Novianto, Dimas Firmansyah, Naufal Pratama (2020)
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DI LAUT NATUNA UTARA, 3
A unilateral claim from China is in the form of dots or 9 dotted ‘Nine-dash line' which forms the letter ‘U' intersects with Indonesia Exclusive Economic Zone. Coordinating Ministry for Maritime Affairs of Indonesia, has issued the latest 2017 Map of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia. The 2017 NKRI Map is the proposed naming of the sea space, which was previously known as part of the South China Sea (SCS), to the North Natuna Sea. Therefore, this study aims to: (1) analyse how the legality of the sovereign rights of the Republic of Indonesia in the North Natuna Sea-based United Nations Convention on the law the Sea 1982; and (2) analyse how the Indonesian government responds in the North Natuna Sea. This research uses normative research methods. The results show that based on UNCLOS 1982, Indonesia has the legality to exercise sovereign rights in the North Natuna Sea. The Republic of Indonesia confirms that there is no dispute with China in the North Natuna Sea because China’s claims are not legal or not based on United Nations Convention on the law the Sea 1982.
Australian Journal of Maritime & Ocean Affairs – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 2, 2024
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.