Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2017)
Supporting Community Revitalization: Curatorial and Conservation Stewardship at the Penn Museum.
Jane Henderson (2022)
Conservators Delivering ChangeStudies in Conservation, 67
(2006)
Perception . 5th ed
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (1982)
The Psychology of PreferencesScientific American, 246
Welsh Government
E. Pye (2008)
The power of touch: handling objects in museum and heritage context
A. Katifori, M. Roussou, S. Perry, Gianpaolo Palma, G. Drettakis, Sebastian Vizcay, J. Philip (2018)
The EMOTIVE Project - Emotive Virtual Cultural Experiences through Personalized Storytelling
(2019)
Assessing Significance
S. Redman (2017)
Museums and Their Visitors
P. Sears (1950)
Conservation in Theory and Practice
(2014)
“ Re-contextualising the ‘ Conservation Versus Access ’ Debate. ”
I. Narkiss, Helen Tomlin (2008)
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS: ENABLING ACCESS TO MUSEUM COLLECTIONSStudies in Conservation, 53
A. N’Gbala, N. Branscombe (1997)
When Does Action Elicit More Regret Than Inaction and Is Counterfactual Mutation the Mediator of This EffectJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33
“ Fundamental Attribution Error: 6 Crucial Questions Answered. ”
Gamaliel Ntieche (2021)
Traditional versus Contemporary Conservation Methods in West Cameroon’s Community MuseumsMuseum International, 73
D. Sully (2015)
Conservation Theory and Practice: Materials, Values, and People in Heritage Conservation
(2022)
“ A ffi rming Change in Participatory Practices of Cultural Conservation. ”
(2022)
. ICOM Approves a New Museum De fi
Joelle Wickens, Anisha Gupta (2022)
Leadership: the Act of Making Way for OthersStudies in Conservation, 67
Saiful Bakhri (2020)
Promoting Traditional Knowledge in Conservation: The Role of The Borobudur Conservation OfficeAICCM Bulletin, 41
M. Frost (1994)
Working with design professionals: preventive conservators as problem solvers, not problem creatorsStudies in Conservation, 39
Manal Ginzarlya, F. Srourb, A. Kassar, M. Ginzarly (2021)
Cultural heritage through the lens of COVID-19Poetics (Hague, Netherlands), 92
Suzanna Lynch, D. Proverbs (2019)
How adaption of historic listed buildings affords accessInternational Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation
K. Hetherington (2000)
Museums and the Visually Impaired: The Spatial Politics of AccessThe Sociological Review, 48
P. Kivy (1973)
Speaking of art
Jane Henderson, R. Waller, David Hopes (2020)
Begin with Benefits: Reducing Bias in Conservation Decision-MakingStudies in Conservation, 65
(2022)
Anti-racist Wales Action Plan
B. Norton (1999)
Ecology and Opportunity: Intergenerational Equity and Sustainable Options
(2017)
“ Pedagogy and the ‘ Working Collection ’ : Teaching Technical Research and Experimental Archaeology at the Johns Hopkins Archaeological Museum. ”
H. Chatterjee (2008)
Touch in Museums: Policy and Practice in Object Handling
(1993)
“ Put to the Touch. ”
E. Pye (2008)
THE BENEFITS OF ACCESS THROUGH HANDLING OUTWEIGH THE RISKSStudies in Conservation, 53
(2022)
“ Cambridge Museums Welcome People with Visual Impairments on ‘ touch tours. ’”
Shunqiang Liu (2006)
The museum environmentSciences of conservation and archaeology
Andrew Thorn (2008)
ACCESS DENIED: RESTRICTED ACCESS TO INDIGENOUS CULTURAL SITESStudies in Conservation, 53
(2022)
ICOM (International Council of Museums)
(2013)
Practice Note: Understanding and Assessing Cultural Signi fi cance
Jane Henderson, K. Rumsey (2015)
Communicating pesticide contamination messages, 29
Joanna Sofaer, Ben Davenport, M. Sørensen, E. Gallou, D. Uzzell (2021)
Heritage sites, value and wellbeing: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic in EnglandInternational Journal of Heritage Studies, 27
Annamma Joy, John Sherry (2003)
Speaking of Art as Embodied Imagination: A Multisensory Approach to Understanding Aesthetic ExperienceJournal of Consumer Research, 30
C. Classen (2020)
Touch in the Museum
Jane Henderson, T. Nakamoto (2016)
Dialogue in conservation decision-makingStudies in Conservation, 61
Salvador Viñas (2022)
Conservation science, conservation practice and the conservator’s knowledge: a naïve explorationJournal of the Institute of Conservation, 45
(2010)
“ The Meaning of the Touching. ”
(2011)
Uncertainty: Turning Fear and Doubt
Jane Henderson, R. Waller (2016)
Effective preservation decision strategiesStudies in Conservation, 61
Conservators have a complex relationship with touching things. As the conservation profession looks to the future, conservators need to be, and be seen to be, co-creators of considered access rather than gatekeepers to collections. The benefits of touch can be physical and tangible, but touch can also inform our emotions, support empathy, or provide a connection. Touch can be used to understand how something moves or to learn how to manipulate things. This paper reviews conservation's engagement with touch, attempting to extract a more nuanced understanding of the values that can be achieved through touching defined by context. By examining issues surrounding who conservation is for, the nature of touch and how conservators discuss it, this paper invites the profession to be more systematic about enabling touch experiences whilst managing these effectively with our conservation responsibilities.
Journal of the American Institute for Conservation – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 2, 2024
Keywords: Conservation; touch; access; inclusion; tactile; handling; co-creation; gatekeeping
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.