Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ashutosh Tiwari, T. Richards (2016)
Social Networks and Restaurant RatingsAgribusiness, 32
J. Mills, M. Reed, K. Skaalsveen, J. Ingram (2019)
The use of Twitter for knowledge exchange on sustainable soil managementSoil Use and Management, 35
Aker J. C. (2015)
262The World Bank Economic Review, 29
H. Mitter, M. Larcher, M. Schönhart, Magdalena Stöttinger, E. Schmid (2019)
Exploring Farmers’ Climate Change Perceptions and Adaptation Intentions: Empirical Evidence from AustriaEnvironmental Management, 63
K. Skaalsveen, J. Ingram, J. Urquhart (2020)
The role of farmers' social networks in the implementation of no-till farming practicesAgricultural Systems
Jack Thompson (2021)
Watching Together: Local Media and Rural Civic Engagement*Rural Sociology
R. Jensen (2007)
The Digital Provide: Information (Technology), Market Performance, and Welfare in the South Indian Fisheries SectorQuarterly Journal of Economics, 122
Lauren Chenarides, Carola Grebitus, J. Lusk, Iryna Printezis (2020)
Food consumption behavior during the COVID‐19 pandemicAgribusiness (New York, N.y.), 37
X. (Hsiao‐Tung) Fei (1947)
Xiangtu Zhongguo (From the Soil)
Timothy Conley, Udry Christopher (2001)
Social Learning Through Networks: The Adoption of New Agricultural Technologies in GhanaAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83
Ana Ramirez (2013)
The Influence of Social Networks on Agricultural Technology AdoptionProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 79
P. Marsden, N. Friedkin (1993)
Network Studies of Social InfluenceSociological Methods & Research, 22
Lisa Jäckering, Theda Gödecke, M. Wollni (2019)
Agriculture–nutrition linkages in farmers’ communication networksAgricultural Economics
Soroush Vosoughi, D. Roy, Sinan Aral (2018)
The spread of true and false news onlineScience, 359
I. Galindo, C. Alonso (2017)
African Swine Fever Virus: A ReviewViruses, 9
J. Aker, M. Fafchamps (2013)
Mobile Phone Coverage and Producer Markets: Evidence from West AfricaERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)
K. Sonneville, Nancy Pelle, E. Taveras, M. Gillman, L. Prosser (2009)
Economic and other barriers to adopting recommendations to prevent childhood obesity: results of a focus group study with parentsBMC Pediatrics, 9
D. Kolbasov, I. Titov, S. Tsybanov, A. Gogin, A. Malogolovkin (2018)
African Swine Fever Virus, Siberia, Russia, 2017Emerging Infectious Diseases, 24
C. Hunold, Yetunde Sorunmu, R. Lindy, S. Spatari, P. Gurian (2017)
Is Urban Agriculture Financially Sustainable? An Exploratory Study of Small-Scale Market Farming in Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaThe Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 7
M. Ghorbani, Seyed Javadi, Sareh Rasekhi, M. Yazdanparast, Hossein Azadi (2022)
Bonding Social Capital of Rural Women in Southwest Iran: Application of Social Network Analysis*Rural Sociology
M. Roghanizad, V. Bohns (2017)
Ask in person: You're less persuasive than you think over emailJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69
Shijun Gao, Carola Grebitus, T. Schmitz (2022)
Effects of risk preferences and social networks on adoption of genomics by Chinese hog farmersJournal of Rural Studies
P. Marsden, K. Campbell (1984)
Measuring Tie StrengthSocial Forces, 63
Mark Granovetter (1973)
The Strength of Weak TiesAmerican Journal of Sociology, 78
Dan Wang, Carola Grebitus, C. Schroeter (2018)
The Effect of Behavioral Contagion and Tie-Strength on Calorie Intake in Food CourtsJournal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 31
D. Lazer, M. Baum, Y. Benkler, A. Berinsky, Kelly Greenhill, F. Menczer, Miriam Metzger, B. Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, M. Schudson, S. Sloman, C. Sunstein, Emily Thorson, D. Watts, Jonathan Zittrain (2018)
The science of fake newsScience, 359
J. Brehm, B. Eisenhauer, R. Krannich (2004)
Dimensions of Community Attachment and Their Relationship to Well‐Being in the Amenity‐Rich Rural West*Rural Sociology, 69
Amit Kumar, Nicholas Epley (2020)
It's surprisingly nice to hear you: Misunderstanding the impact of communication media can lead to suboptimal choices of how to connect with others.Journal of experimental psychology. General
Brehm J. M. (2004)
405Rural Sociology, 69
J. Lachal, M. Speranza, Olivier Taïeb, B. Falissard, H. Lefèvre, M. Moro, A. Revah-Levy (2012)
Qualitative research using photo-elicitation to explore the role of food in family relationships among obese adolescentsAppetite, 58
G. Sadikaj, D. Moskowitz (2018)
I hear but I don't see you: Interacting over phone reduces the accuracy of perceiving affiliation in the otherComput. Hum. Behav., 89
Bobbi Gilder, Shadee Abdi (2014)
Identity Management and the Fostering of Network Ignorance: Accounts of Queer Iranian Women in the United StatesJournal of Intercultural Communication Research, 43
L. Gong, Runda Xu, Z. Wang, Qiwei Deng, Heng Wang, Guihong Zhang (2020)
African swine fever recovery in China.Veterinary medicine and science
Ira Matuschke, M. Qaim (2009)
The impact of social networks on hybrid seed adoption in IndiaAgricultural Economics, 40
The outbreak of African swine fever (ASF) had an enormous economic and social impact on Chinese hog producers. Using a face‐to‐face survey with hog farmers from two regions of China, Chongqing, and Hebei, this research investigated how social influence affects producers’ behavior under disease outbreak using social network analysis. It was analyzed how information flows during an epidemic, such as ASF. Results indicate that hog producers used phone and text more frequently to communicate during the epidemic than before. Face‐to‐face meetings with other hog producers and sales agents decreased during the ASF epidemic—potentially leading to isolation. Moreover, the frequency of face‐to‐face meetings with veterinarians decreased for farmers living in a village in Hebei but remained the same for hog producers in Chongqing. This suggests that the desire to have less face‐to‐face meetings was being replaced with the demand for more help regarding hog health from veterinarians when hog producers lived farther away from each other compared to those living closer together. Employing a random effect ordered probit model, these results were further validated, showing that hog producers dramatically reduced their communication frequency with others after the outbreak of ASF. Findings provide insights into how information flows and how actors communicate during a situation of crisis. [EconLit Citations: D71, D85, Q12, Q18].
Agribusiness: An International Journal – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2023
Keywords: Crisis; Hog production; Outbreak; Peer effects; Social network analysis
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.