Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Nourmandipour, M. Tavassoly (2015)
Dynamics and protecting of entanglement in two-level systems interacting with a dissipative cavity: the Gardiner–Collett approachJournal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 48
Jin-sheng Peng, Gao-xiang Li (1998)
Introduction To Modern Quantum Optics
Zhuo Liu, Lulin Kuang, Kai Hu, Luting Xu, Su-juan Wei, Lingzhen Guo, Xin-Qi Li (2010)
Deterministic creation and stabilization of entanglement in circuit QED by homodyne-mediated feedback controlPhysical Review A, 82
S. Maniscalco, F. Francica, R. Zaffino, N. Gullo, F. Plastina (2007)
Protecting entanglement via the quantum Zeno effect.Physical review letters, 100 9
Qilin Wang, Rongfang Liu, Hong-Mei Zou, Dan Long, Jia Wang (2022)
Entanglement dynamics of an open moving-biparticle system driven by classical-fieldPhysica Scripta, 97
Dong-fen Li, Mingzhe Liu (2018)
Quantum Entanglement Death Problem Depict in Two Atomic SystemsInternational Journal of Theoretical Physics, 57
V. Scarani, H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci, N. Cerf, M. Dušek, N. Lutkenhaus, M. Peev (2008)
The security of practical quantum key distributionReviews of Modern Physics, 81
G. Vidal, R. Werner (2001)
Computable measure of entanglementPhysical Review A, 65
B. Ahansaz, N. Behzadi, E. Faizi (2017)
Protection of entanglement for a two-qutrit V-type open system on the basis of system-reservoir bound statesThe European Physical Journal D, 73
E. Faraji, H. Baghshahi, M. Tavassoly (2017)
The influence of atomic dipole–dipole interaction on the dynamics of the population inversion and entanglement of two atoms interacting non-resonantly with two coupled modes fieldModern Physics Letters B, 31
M. Hettrich, T. Ruster, H. Kaufmann, C. Roos, C. Schmiegelow, Ferdinand Schmidt-Kaler, U. Poschinger (2015)
Measurement of Dipole Matrix Elements with a Single Trapped Ion.Physical review letters, 115 14
Shu-Chao Wang, Shu-Chao Wang, Zong-Wen Yu, Wentao Zou, Wentao Zou, Xiang-Bin Wang, Xiang-Bin Wang (2013)
Protecting quantum states from decoherence of finite temperature using weak measurementPhysical Review A, 89
Gabriel Wong, I. Klich, L. Zayas, D. Vaman (2013)
Entanglement temperature and entanglement entropy of excited statesJournal of High Energy Physics, 2013
J. Fink, M. Göppl, M. Baur, R. Bianchetti, P. Leek, A. Blais, A. Wallraff (2008)
Climbing the Jaynes–Cummings ladder and observing its nonlinearity in a cavity QED systemNature, 454
Hui Guo, Na Liu, Zhi Li, RongGuo Yang, Hengxin Sun, Kui Liu, Jiangrui Gao (2022)
Generation of continuous-variable high-dimensionalentanglement with 3 degrees of freedom andmultiplexing quantum dense codingPhotonics Research
M. Shaukat (2022)
Nonreciprocal quantum correlations and dense codingPhysical Review A
N. Behzadi, B. Ahansaz, E. Faizi (2016)
Quantum coherence and entanglement preservation in Markovian and non-Markovian dynamics via additional qubitsThe European Physical Journal D, 71
A. Mortezapour, A. Nourmandipour, H. Gholipour (2019)
The effect of classical driving field on the spectrum of a qubit and entanglement swapping inside dissipative cavitiesQuantum Information Processing, 19
Z. Shi, Hai-Ning Wu, L. Shen, Jie Song, Y. Xia, X. Yi, Shi-Biao Zheng (2020)
Robust single-qubit gates by composite pulses in three-level systems
M. Rafiee, A. Nourmandipour, S. Mancini (2017)
Universal feedback control of two-qubit entanglementPhysical Review A, 96
B. Mojaveri, A. Dehghani, Z. Ahmadi (2021)
A quantum correlated heat engine based on the parity-deformed Jaynes–Cummings model: achieving the classical Carnot efficiency by a local classical fieldPhysica Scripta, 96
Ying-Jie Zhang, Z. Man, X. Zou, Y. Xia, G. Guo (2010)
Dynamics of multipartite entanglement in the non-Markovian environmentsJournal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 43
N. Bronn, E. Magesan, N. Masluk, J. Chow, J. Gambetta, M. Steffen (2015)
Reducing Spontaneous Emission in Circuit Quantum Electrodynamics by a Combined Readout/Filter TechniqueIEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 25
N. Behzadi, E. Faizi, O. Heibati (2017)
Quantum discord protection of a two-qutrit V-type atomic system from decoherence by partially collapsing measurementsQuantum Information Processing, 16
R. Renner (2005)
Security of quantum key distribution
E. Camouzis, G. Ladas, H. Voulov (2003)
On the Dynamics ofJournal of Difference Equations and Applications, 9
M. Fasihi (2019)
Entanglement preservation in a system of two dipole–dipole interacting two-level atoms coupled with single mode cavityPhysica Scripta, 94
Marvin Flores, E. Galapon (2015)
Two qubit entanglement preservation through the addition of qubitsAnnals of Physics, 354
Shuai Liu, Jun-Hui Shen, Ri-Hua Zheng, Yi‐Hao Kang, Z. Shi, Jie Song, Y. Xia (2021)
Optimized nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation based on Förster resonance in Rydberg atomsFrontiers of Physics, 17
N. Metwally, H. Eleuch, A. Obada (2015)
Sudden death and rebirth of entanglement for different dimensional systems driven by a classical random external fieldLaser Physics Letters, 13
Yong-Su Kim, Jong-Chan Lee, O. Kwon, Yoon-Ho Kim (2011)
Protecting entanglement from decoherence using weak measurement and quantum measurement reversalNature Physics, 8
Qiang Wen (2019)
Formulas for partial entanglement entropyPhysical Review Research
Meijiao Wang, Y. Xia, Ying-de Li, Yang Yang, Lianzhen Cao, Qinwei Zhang, Jiaqiang Zhao (2020)
Protecting Qutrit-Qutrit Entanglement Under Decoherence via Weak Measurement and Measurement ReversalInternational Journal of Theoretical Physics, 59
Scalable net-11
Erik Fitzke, Lucas Bialowons, Till Dolejsky, Maximilian Tippmann, Oleg Nikiforov, Felix Wissel, M. Gunkel, T. Walther (2021)
A scalable network for simultaneous pairwise quantum key distribution via entanglement-based time-bin coding
S. Neumann, M. Selimovic, M. Bohmann, R. Ursin (2021)
Experimental entanglement generation for quantum key distribution beyond 1 Gbit/sQuantum
Ke-hsueh Li, Chuan-hua Dong (2005)
Dynamic behaviors of coupled three-level atom system interacting with light field in cavity filled with Kerr-like mediumJournal of Shanghai University (English Edition), 9
Yang Li, Jiang Zhou, Hong Guo (2008)
Effect of the dipole-dipole interaction for two atoms with different couplings in a non-Markovian environmentPhysical Review A, 79
Yi‐Hao Kang, Jie Song, Y. Xia (2022)
Error-resistant nonadiabatic binomial-code geometric quantum computation using reverse engineeringOptics Letters
Patryk Lipka-Bartosik, Paul Skrzypczyk (2021)
Catalytic Quantum Teleportation.Physical review letters, 127 8
(1984)
Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing
Wai-Keong Mok, Jia-bin You, Wenzu Zhang, Wan-Li Yang, C. Png (2019)
Control of spontaneous emission of qubits from weak to strong couplingPhysical Review A
B. Bellomo, R. Franco, G. Compagno (2007)
Non-markovian effects on the dynamics of entanglement.Physical review letters, 99 16
D. Bouwmeester, Jian-Wei Pan, Klaus Mattle, Manfred Eibl, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger (1997)
Experimental quantum teleportationNature, 390
B. Mojaveri, A. Dehghani, J. Taghipour (2022)
Control of entanglement, single excited-state population and memory-assisted entropic uncertainty of two qubits moving in a cavity by using a classical driving fieldThe European Physical Journal Plus, 137
Hiroki Takahashi, Ezra Kassa, C. Christoforou, M. Keller (2018)
Strong Coupling of a Single Ion to an Optical Cavity.Physical review letters, 124 1
Simone Rijavec, M. Carlesso, A. Bassi, V. Vedral, C. Marletto (2020)
Decoherence effects in non-classicality tests of gravityNew Journal of Physics, 23
Chuang Li, Sen Yang, Jie Song, Y. Xia, Weiqiang Ding (2017)
Generation of long-living entanglement between two distant three-level atoms in non-Markovian environments.Optics express, 25 10
B. Vlastakis, A. Petrenko, N. Ofek, Luyan Sun, Z. Leghtas, K. Sliwa, Yehan Liu, M. Hatridge, J. Blumoff, L. Frunzio, M. Mirrahimi, Liang Jiang, M. Devoret, R. Schoelkopf (2015)
Characterizing entanglement of an artificial atom and a cavity cat state with Bell's inequalityNature Communications, 6
廖湘萍, 方卯发, 方见树, 朱钱泉 (2014)
Preserving entanglement and the fidelity of three-qubit quantum states undergoing decoherence using weak measurement
Xiang-Ping 廖, Mao-Fa 方, J. 方, Qian-Quan 朱 (2013)
Preserving entanglement and the fidelity of three-qubit quantum states undergoing decoherence using weak measurementChinese Physics B, 23
A. Manzalini, M. Amoretti (2022)
End-to-End Entanglement Generation Strategies: Capacity Bounds and Impact on Quantum Key DistributionQuantum Reports
Bao-Jie Liu, Xue-ke Song, Z. Xue, Xin Wang, M. Yung (2018)
Plug-and-Play Approach to Nonadiabatic Geometric Quantum Gates.Physical review letters, 123 10
A. Stute, B. Casabone, P. Schindler, T. Monz, P. Schmidt, P. Schmidt, B. Brandstätter, T. Northup, R. Blatt (2012)
Tunable Ion-Photon Entanglement in an Optical CavityNature, 485
Ferdi Altintas, R. Eryigit (2010)
Dynamics of entanglement and Bell non-locality for two stochastic qubits with dipole–dipole interactionJournal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 43
Wen-Juan Li, Yun-Hui Zhao, Yang Leng (2019)
Protecting high-dimensional quantum entanglement from the amplitude-phase decoherence sources by weak measurement and reversalLaser Physics, 29
D. McKay, R. Naik, P. Reinhold, L. Bishop, D. Schuster (2014)
High-contrast qubit interactions using multimode cavity QED.Physical review letters, 114 8
D. DiVincenzo (1995)
Quantum ComputationScience, 270
Ting Yu, J. Eberly (2009)
Sudden Death of EntanglementScience, 323
Mohan Gupta, A. Bhushan, Sandeep Sen (1995)
Quantum computation, 270
P. Leek, M. Baur, J. Fink, R. Bianchetti, L. Steffen, S. Filipp, A. Wallraff (2009)
Cavity quantum electrodynamics with separate photon storage and qubit readout modes.Physical review letters, 104 10
Klaus Mattle, Weinfurter, Kwiat, Zeilinger (1996)
Dense coding in experimental quantum communication.Physical review letters, 76 25
Rongfang Liu, Hong-Mei Zou, Jianhe Yang, Danping Lin (2020)
Entanglement witness and entropy uncertainty of an open quantum system under the Zeno effectJournal of the Optical Society of America B
P. Calabrese, J. Cardy, E. Tonni (2012)
Entanglement negativity in quantum field theory.Physical review letters, 109 13
G. Agarwal (1971)
Rotating-Wave Approximation and Spontaneous EmissionPhysical Review A, 7
A. Nourmandipour, A. Vafafard, A. Mortezapour, R. Franzosi (2021)
Entanglement protection of classically driven qubits in a lossy cavityScientific Reports, 11
W. Wootters (1997)
Entanglement of Formation of an Arbitrary State of Two QubitsPhysical Review Letters, 80
Meijiao Wang, Y. Xia, Ying-de Li, Yang Yang, Lianzhen Cao, Xia Liu, Xinle Wang, Qinwei Zhang, Jiaqiang Zhao (2021)
Protecting Two-qutrit Entanglement in Four Noise Channel Via Weak Measurement and Measurement ReversalInternational Journal of Theoretical Physics, 60
B. Bellomo, R. Franco, G. Compagno (2018)
Non-Markovian effects on the dynamics of entanglement
D. Llewellyn, Yunhong Ding, I. Faruque, S. Paesani, D. Bacco, R. Santagati, Y. Qian, Yan Li, Yun-Feng Xiao, M. Huber, M. Malik, G. Sinclair, Xiaoqi Zhou, K. Rottwitt, J. O'Brien, J. Rarity, Q. Gong, L. Oxenløwe, Jianwei Wang, M. Thompson (2019)
Chip-to-chip quantum teleportation and multi-photon entanglement in siliconNature Physics, 16
Hong-Mei Zou, M. Fang (2016)
Discord and entanglement in non-Markovian environments at finite temperatures*Chinese Physics B, 25
S. Pirandola, J. Eisert, C. Weedbrook, A. Furusawa, S. Braunstein (2015)
Advances in quantum teleportationNature Photonics, 9
Zhihui Yan, Jiliang Qin, Zhongzhong Qin, Xiaolong Su, X. Jia, C. Xie, K. Peng (2021)
Generation of non-classical states of light and their application in deterministic quantum teleportationFundamental Research
Hong-Mei Zou, M. Fang (2015)
Analytical solution and entanglement swapping of a double Jaynes–Cummings model in non-Markovian environmentsQuantum Information Processing, 14
A. Mandilara, V. Akulin (2006)
Cooperative behaviour of qutrits with dipole–dipole interactionsJournal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 40
B. Mojaveri, A. Dehghani, M. Fasihi, T. Mohammadpour (2019)
Ground state and thermal entanglement between two two-level atoms interacting with a nondegenerate parametric amplifier: Different sub-spacesInternational Journal of Modern Physics B
Yazhen Wang (2012)
Quantum Computation and Quantum InformationStatistical Science, 27
Jing Zhang, Rebing Wu, Chunwen Li, T. Tarn (2010)
Protecting Coherence and Entanglement by Quantum Feedback ControlsIEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 55
Xiang-Bin Wang, J. You, F. Nori (2007)
Quantum entanglement via two-qubit quantum Zeno dynamicsPhysical Review A, 77
Nilakantha Meher (2020)
Scheme for realizing quantum dense coding via entanglement swappingJournal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 53
D. Nadlinger, P. Drmota, B. Nichol, G. Araneda, D. Main, R. Srinivas, D. Lucas, C. Ballance, K. Ivanov, E. Tan, P. Sekatski, R. Urbanke, R. Renner, N. Sangouard, J. Bancal (2021)
Experimental quantum key distribution certified by Bell's theoremNature, 607
Yu Guo, Bi-Heng Liu, Chuan‐Feng Li, G. Guo (2019)
Advances in Quantum Dense CodingAdvanced Quantum Technologies, 2
Xing Xiao, Yan-Ling Li (2013)
Protecting qutrit-qutrit entanglement by weak measurement and reversalThe European Physical Journal D, 67
Q. Mu, P. Lin (2020)
Non-Markovian entanglement transfer to distant atoms in a coupled superconducting resonatorChinese Physics B
A. Cacciapuoti, M. Caleffi, R. Meter, L. Hanzo (2019)
When Entanglement Meets Classical Communications: Quantum Teleportation for the Quantum InternetIEEE Transactions on Communications, 68
In this work, a coupled system of two V‐type atoms with dipole–dipole interaction in a dissipative single‐mode cavity, which couples with an external environment, is studied. The analytical solution of this model is obtained by solving the time dependent Schrodinger equation after Hamiltonian of dissipative cavity is diagonalized by introducing a set of new creation and annihilation operators according to Fano theorem. It is also discussed in detail how the entanglement dynamics of different initial states are influenced by the cavity‐environment coupling, the spontaneously generated interference (SGI) parameter, and the dipole–dipole interaction between two atoms . The results show that the SGI parameter has different effects on entanglement dynamics under different initial states. Namely, the SGI parameter will increase the decay rate of the initially maximal entangled state and reduce that of the initially partial entangled state. For the initially product state, the larger SGI parameter corresponds to the more entanglement generated. The entanglement monotonically decreases under the weak cavity‐environment coupling, while the oscillation of entanglement will occur under the strong cavity‐environment coupling. The larger the dipole–dipole interaction is, the slower the entanglement decays and the more the entanglement will be generated. So the dipole–dipole interaction can not only protect and generate entanglement very effectively, but also enhance the regulation effect of the SGI parameter on entanglement.
Annalen der Physik – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2023
Keywords: dipole–dipole interaction; entanglement protection; initial states
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.