Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Lampi, P. Fitzpatrick, V. Romero, J. Amaral, R. C. Schmidt (2018)
Understanding the influence of social and motor context on the co‐occurring frequency of restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism, 50
M. G. Meany‐Daboul, E. M. Roscoe, J. C. Bourret, W. H. Ahearn (2007)
A comparison of momentary time sampling and partial‐interval recording for evaluating functional relations, 40
Kara Wunderlich, T. Vollmer (2015)
Data analysis of response interruption and redirection as a treatment for vocal stereotypy.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 48 4
K. Looney, Jaime DeQuinzio, B. Taylor (2018)
Using self‐monitoring and differential reinforcement of low rates of behavior to decrease repetitive behaviors: A case studyBehavioral Interventions, 33
A. E. Kazdin (1972)
Response cost: The removal of conditioned reinforcers for therapeutic change, 3
J. L. Chen, G. Leader, C. Sung, M. Leahy (2014)
Trends in employment for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A review of the research literature, 2
Chana Gehrman, David Wilder, Alexander Forton, Kristin Albert (2017)
Comparing resetting to non‐resetting DRO procedures to reduce stereotypy in a child with autismBehavioral Interventions, 32
Amanda Laprime, Gretchen Dittrich (2014)
An Evaluation of a Treatment Package Consisting of Discrimination Training and Differential Reinforcement with Response Cost and a Social Story on Vocal Stereotypy for a Preschooler with Autism in a Preschool ClassroomEducation and Treatment of Children, 37
M. P. Groskreutz, N. C. Groskreutz, T. S. Higbee (2011)
Response competition and stimulus preference in the treatment of automatically reinforced behavior: A comparison, 44
M. J. Lanovaz, I. E. Sladeczek (2012)
Vocal stereotypy in individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A review of behavioral interventions, 36
Candice Colón, W. Ahearn (2019)
An analysis of treatment integrity of response interruption and redirection.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 52 2
J. Rapp, T. Vollmer (2005)
Stereotypy I: a review of behavioral assessment and treatment.Research in developmental disabilities, 26 6
Inhwan Park, Yu-Ri Kim (2018)
Effects of TEACCH Structured Teaching on Independent Work Skills among Individuals with Severe DisabilitiesEducation and training in autism and developmental disabilities, 53
Andrew Bonner, J. Borrero (2018)
Differential Reinforcement of Low Rate Schedules Reduce Severe Problem BehaviorBehavior Modification, 42
B. Taylor, Hannah Hoch, M. Weissman (2005)
The analysis and treatment of vocal stereotypy in a child with autismBehavioral Interventions, 20
J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward (2020)
Applied behavior analysis
M. Lanovaz, Ingrid Sladeczek (2012)
Vocal Stereotypy in Individuals With Autism Spectrum DisordersBehavior Modification, 36
W. H. Ahearn, K. M. Clark, R. P. F. MacDonald, B. I. Chung (2007)
Assessing and treating vocal stereotypy in children with ASD, 40
E. Rozenblat, John Brown, A. Brown, Sharon Reeve, K. Reeve (2009)
EFFECTS OF ADJUSTING DRO SCHEDULES ON THE REDUCTION OF STEREOTYPIC VOCALIZATIONS IN CHILDREN WITH AUTISMBehavioral Interventions, 24
B. A. Iwata, M. F. Dorsey, K. J. Slifer, K. E. Bauman, G. S. Richman (1982/1994)
Toward a functional analysis of self‐injury, 27
Angie Querim, Brian Iwata, E. Roscoe, Kevin Schlichenmeyer, Javier Ortega, Kylee Hurl (2013)
Functional analysis screening for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 46 1
C. S. Wright, T. R. Vollmer (2002)
Evaluation of a treatment package to reduce rapid eating, 35
Theoni Mantzoros, Ashley McCoy, David Lee (2022)
Treatments for automatically reinforced vocal stereotypy for individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A literature and meta‐analytic reviewBehavioral Interventions
S. M. Deitz (1977)
An analysis of programming DRL schedules in educational settings, 15
E. N. Ahrens, D. C. Lerman, T. Kodak, A. S. Worsdell, C. Keegan (2011)
Further evaluation of response interruption and redirection as treatment for stereotypy, 44
M. D. Cassella, T. M. Sidener, D. W. Sidener, P. R. Progar (2011)
Response interruption and redirection for vocal stereotypy in children with autism: A systematic replication, 44
T. S. Falcomata, H. S. Roane, A. N. Hovanetz, T. L. Kettering, K. M. Keeney (2004)
An evaluation of response cost in the treatment of inappropriate vocalizations maintained by automatic reinforcement, 37
N. Gardenier, Rebecca MacDonald, G. Green (2004)
Comparison of direct observational methods for measuring stereotypic behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders.Research in developmental disabilities, 25 2
J. L. Austin, D. Bevan (2011)
Using differential reinforcement of low rates to reduce children's requests for teacher attention, 44
John Cooper, Timothy Heron, William Heward (2020)
Análisis aplicado de conducta, tercera edición
W. Fisher, C. C. Piazza, L. G. Bowman, L. P. Hagopian, J. C. Owens, I. Slevin (1992)
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities, 25
Janet Williams (2013)
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Vocal stereotypy (VS) is often observed in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) which at high rates can interfere with socialization or functioning in structured settings. There are multiple effective interventions available; yet, many procedures target the complete omission of the behavior or are only assessed at short intervals, making it unclear how they will generalize in applied settings. One intervention yet to be assessed as an individual intervention for automatically reinforced VS is differential reinforcement of low rates of behavior (DRL). In the present study, a functional analysis determined that the VS of two female adolescents with ASD was maintained by automatic reinforcement. A DRL procedure was implemented which incorporated: (a) a specified interval for reinforcement; (b) the behavioral expectations; (c) the permissible instances of VS within the interval; (d) learner feedback; and (e) the reset/non‐reset aspect of the schedule. As the targeted behavior decreased across sessions, the DRL interval was systematically increased in order to thin out the schedule of reinforcement. The intervention reduced VS and increased untargeted task engagement for both participants. Applied and theoretical implications of the study as well as social validity, limitations, and future research are discussed.
Behavioral Interventions – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2023
Keywords: autism spectrum disorder; automatic reinforcement; differential reinforcement of low rates; task engagement; vocal stereotypy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.