Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Working memory‐related brain activity in cannabis use disorder: The role of cross‐cultural differences in cannabis attitudes

Working memory‐related brain activity in cannabis use disorder: The role of cross‐cultural... Cannabis legislation and attitudes towards use are changing. Given that evidence from cultural neuroscience research suggests that culture influences the neurobiological mechanisms underlying behaviour, it is of great importance to understand how cannabis legislation and attitudes might affect the brain processes underlying cannabis use disorder. Brain activity of 100 dependent cannabis users and 84 controls was recorded during an N‐back working memory (WM) task in participants from the Netherlands (NL; users = 60, controls = 52) and Texas, USA (TX; users = 40, controls = 32). Participants completed a cannabis culture questionnaire as a measure of perceived benefits (positive) and perceived harms (negative) of cannabis from their personal, friends–family's and country–state's perspectives. Amount of cannabis use (grams/week), DSM‐5 CUD symptoms and cannabis use‐related problems were assessed. Cannabis users self‐reported more positive and less negative (personal and friends–family) cannabis attitudes than controls, with this effect being significantly larger in the TX cannabis users. No site difference in country–state attitudes was observed. TX cannabis users, compared with NL cannabis users, and those cannabis users perceiving more positive country–state attitudes showed a more positive association between grams/week and WM‐related activity in the superior parietal lobe. NL cannabis users, compared with TX cannabis users, and those cannabis users with less positive personal attitudes showed a more positive association between grams/week and WM‐load‐related activity in the temporal pole. Both site and cultural attitudes moderated the association of quantity of cannabis use with WM‐ and WM‐load‐related activity. Importantly, differences in legislation did not align with perceived cannabis attitudes and appear to be differentially associated with cannabis use‐related brain activity. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Addiction Biology Wiley

Working memory‐related brain activity in cannabis use disorder: The role of cross‐cultural differences in cannabis attitudes

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/working-memory-related-brain-activity-in-cannabis-use-disorder-the-yV0Q9z0NaO

References (51)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2023 Society for the Study of Addiction
ISSN
1355-6215
eISSN
1369-1600
DOI
10.1111/adb.13283
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Cannabis legislation and attitudes towards use are changing. Given that evidence from cultural neuroscience research suggests that culture influences the neurobiological mechanisms underlying behaviour, it is of great importance to understand how cannabis legislation and attitudes might affect the brain processes underlying cannabis use disorder. Brain activity of 100 dependent cannabis users and 84 controls was recorded during an N‐back working memory (WM) task in participants from the Netherlands (NL; users = 60, controls = 52) and Texas, USA (TX; users = 40, controls = 32). Participants completed a cannabis culture questionnaire as a measure of perceived benefits (positive) and perceived harms (negative) of cannabis from their personal, friends–family's and country–state's perspectives. Amount of cannabis use (grams/week), DSM‐5 CUD symptoms and cannabis use‐related problems were assessed. Cannabis users self‐reported more positive and less negative (personal and friends–family) cannabis attitudes than controls, with this effect being significantly larger in the TX cannabis users. No site difference in country–state attitudes was observed. TX cannabis users, compared with NL cannabis users, and those cannabis users perceiving more positive country–state attitudes showed a more positive association between grams/week and WM‐related activity in the superior parietal lobe. NL cannabis users, compared with TX cannabis users, and those cannabis users with less positive personal attitudes showed a more positive association between grams/week and WM‐load‐related activity in the temporal pole. Both site and cultural attitudes moderated the association of quantity of cannabis use with WM‐ and WM‐load‐related activity. Importantly, differences in legislation did not align with perceived cannabis attitudes and appear to be differentially associated with cannabis use‐related brain activity.

Journal

Addiction BiologyWiley

Published: Jun 1, 2023

Keywords: attitudes; cannabis; cognitive control; culture; fMRI; working memory

There are no references for this article.